UPDATED: 09-08-25 10:43 PDT

women St Leo 2
  
St Leo                
W-L: (13- 6) PR = 96.5001

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 207 A Belmont Abbey Carolinas ( 9- 9, 89.0) 18- 5 209 A Limestone South Atlanti (14- 5, 94.1) 14-11 215 A Flagler Gulf South (11- 5, 95.8) 10- 9 218 A Florida Southern Sunshine (17- 2, 99.3) 12-17 221 H Alabama-Huntsville Gulf South ( 7-11, 92.9) 12-10 301 H Colorado Mesa Rocky Mountai (11- 6, 91.4) 18-10 304 H Lenoir-Rhyne South Atlanti (11- 8, 90.7) 17- 4 313 H Seton Hill PSAC (13- 6, 94.1) 15-12 316 H Kutztown PSAC ( 9- 8, 94.5) 13- 5 318 H Southern Connecticut Northeast 10 ( 9- 8, 90.4) 14- 8 322 A Florida Tech Sunshine ( 6-12, 94.0) 17-14 329 A Lynn Sunshine (13- 4, 97.3) 12-18 402 H Embry-Riddle Sunshine (16- 3, 98.1) 11-15 405 H Florida Southern Sunshine (17- 2, 99.3) 10-18 409 H Tampa Sunshine (17- 1, 99.9) 9-10 412 A Palm Beach Atlantic Sunshine ( 6-10, 91.0) 22- 9 415 H Rollins Sunshine ( 8- 8, 94.7) 21-11 419 A Lynn Sunshine (13- 4, 97.3) 11-10 424 A Tampa Sunshine (17- 1, 99.9) 11-14

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   207 A Belmont Abbey          18- 5      13     7           0.00
   209 A Limestone              14-11       3     2           1.11
   215 A Flagler                10- 9       1     0           0.87
   218 A Florida Southern       12-17      -5    -3          -1.67
   221 H Alabama-Huntsville     12-10       2     4    -     -2.16
   301 H Colorado Mesa          18-10       8     6           0.00
   304 H Lenoir-Rhyne           17- 4      13     6           0.00
   313 H Seton Hill             15-12       3     3           0.02
   316 H Kutztown               13- 5       8     3    +      2.42
   318 H Southern Connecticut   14- 8       6     7           0.00
   322 A Florida Tech           17-14       3     2           1.08
   329 A Lynn                   12-18      -6    -1    -     -3.67
   402 H Embry-Riddle           11-15      -4    -1    -     -2.99
   405 H Florida Southern       10-18      -8    -2    -     -2.77
   409 H Tampa                   9-10      -1    -3           1.85
   412 A Palm Beach Atlantic    22- 9      13     5           0.02
   415 H Rollins                21-11      10     2    +      2.66
   419 A Lynn                   11-10       1    -1    +      2.33
   424 A Tampa                  11-14      -3    -4           0.95

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   221 H Alabama-Huntsville     12-10       2     4    -     -2.16
   329 A Lynn                   12-18      -6    -1    -     -3.67
   402 H Embry-Riddle           11-15      -4    -1    -     -2.99
   405 H Florida Southern       10-18      -8    -2    -     -2.77

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   316 H Kutztown               13- 5       8     3    +      2.42
   415 H Rollins                21-11      10     2    +      2.66
   419 A Lynn                   11-10       1    -1    +      2.33

St Leo Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Adelphi St Leo insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) St Leo
Alabama-Huntsville St Leo St Leo  
American International St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Anderson (SC) St Leo St Leo   5- 1 vs 2- 4
Ashland St Leo   St Leo
Assumption St Leo tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) St Leo
Barton St Leo insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) St Leo
Belmont Abbey St Leo St Leo  
Bentley St Leo insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) St Leo
Bloomsburg St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Bridgeport St Leo   St Leo
Caldwell St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Catawba St Leo St Leo   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Charleston St Leo   St Leo
Chestnut Hill St Leo   St Leo
Chowan St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Coker St Leo St Leo   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Colorado Mesa St Leo St Leo  
Colorado-Colorado Spring St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Concordia-St Paul St Leo   St Leo
Converse St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
CSU-Pueblo St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
D'Youville St Leo   St Leo
Daemen St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Davenport St Leo   St Leo
Davis & Elkins St Leo   St Leo
District of Columbia St Leo   St Leo
Dominican (CA) St Leo   St Leo
Dominican (NY) St Leo tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) St Leo
East Stroudsburg St Leo tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) St Leo
Edinboro St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Embry-Riddle Embry-Riddle Embry-Riddle  
Emmanuel (GA) St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Emory & Henry St Leo St Leo   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Felician St Leo   St Leo
Findlay St Leo   St Leo
Flagler St Leo St Leo  
Florida Southern Florida Southern Florida Southern  
Florida Tech St Leo St Leo  
Fort Lewis St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Franklin Pierce St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Frostburg State St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Gannon St Leo St Leo   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Georgian Court St Leo St Leo   3- 1 vs 0- 3
Grand Valley State St Leo tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) St Leo
Holy Family St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Indiana (PA) St Leo St Leo   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Indianapolis St Leo St Leo   3- 3 vs 1- 4
Kutztown St Leo St Leo  
Lake Erie St Leo   St Leo
Lander St Leo St Leo   6- 1 vs 4- 3
Lee St Leo St Leo   3- 3 vs 0- 6
Lees-McRae St Leo   St Leo
Lenoir-Rhyne St Leo St Leo  
Lewis St Leo   St Leo
Limestone St Leo St Leo  
Lincoln Memorial St Leo St Leo   3- 1 vs 0- 4
Lock Haven St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Lynn Lynn insuffient: ( 6- 3)( 7- 2) Lynn
Malone St Leo   St Leo
Mars Hill St Leo St Leo   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Maryville St Leo tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) St Leo
McKendree St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Mercy St Leo tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) St Leo
Millersville St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Missouri Western St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Molloy St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Montevallo St Leo St Leo   5- 2 vs 0- 6
Mount Olive St Leo St Leo   4- 1 vs 0- 4
New Haven St Leo insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) St Leo
Newberry St Leo insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) St Leo
North Greenville St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Northern Michigan St Leo   St Leo
Northwood St Leo   St Leo
Pace St Leo tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 2) St Leo
Palm Beach Atlantic St Leo St Leo  
Post St Leo   St Leo
Quincy St Leo   St Leo
Regis (CO) St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Roberts Wesleyan St Leo   St Leo
Rockhurst St Leo tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) St Leo
Rollins St Leo St Leo  
Saginaw Valley State St Leo   St Leo
Seton Hill St Leo St Leo  
Shepherd St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Shippensburg St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Shorter St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Slippery Rock St Leo tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) St Leo
Southern Connecticut St Leo St Leo  
Southern New Hampshire St Leo St Leo   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Southern Wesleyan St Leo   St Leo
St Anselm St Leo tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) St Leo
St Michaels St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
St Thomas Aquinas St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Tampa Tampa Tampa  
Thomas Jefferson St Leo   St Leo
Thomas More St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Tiffin St Leo   St Leo
Tusculum St Leo St Leo   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Ursuline St Leo   St Leo
UVA Wise St Leo St Leo   5- 1 vs 0- 5
Virginia State St Leo   St Leo
Walsh St Leo   St Leo
West Chester West Chester tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) West Chester
West Virginia Wesleyan St Leo   St Leo
Westminster (UT) St Leo insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) St Leo
Wheeling St Leo   St Leo
William Jewell St Leo   St Leo
Wilmington (DE) St Leo   St Leo
Wingate St Leo insuffient: ( 5- 0)( 4- 1) St Leo
Young Harris St Leo St Leo   3- 0 vs 1- 2

PowerWise = 106


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 16.16

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Belmont Abbey   ( 9- 9, 89.0)    18- 5      -10.91      20.27       0.55         0.85            17.72
   0 A Limestone       (14- 5, 94.1)    14-11       -5.84      25.34       0.55         0.85            22.02
   0 A Flagler         (11- 5, 95.8)    10- 9       -4.08      27.10       0.55         0.85            23.52
   0 A Florida Southe  (17- 2, 99.3)    12-17       -0.62      30.56       0.55         0.85            -0.06
   0 H Alabama-Huntsv  ( 7-11, 92.9)    12-10       -7.01      24.17      -0.55         0.85            20.09
   0 H Colorado Mesa   (11- 6, 91.4)    18-10       -8.55      22.63      -0.55         0.85            18.78
   0 H Lenoir-Rhyne    (11- 8, 90.7)    17- 4       -9.25      21.94      -0.55         0.85            18.19
   0 H Seton Hill      (13- 6, 94.1)    15-12       -5.83      25.35      -0.55         0.85            21.09
   0 H Kutztown        ( 9- 8, 94.5)    13- 5       -5.42      25.76      -0.55         0.85            21.44
   0 H Southern Conne  ( 9- 8, 90.4)    14- 8       -9.54      21.64      -0.55         0.85            17.94
   0 A Florida Tech    ( 6-12, 94.0)    17-14       -5.87      25.31       0.55         0.85            22.00
   0 A Lynn            (13- 4, 97.3)    12-18       -2.63      28.56       0.55         0.85            -1.76
   0 H Embry-Riddle    (16- 3, 98.1)    11-15       -1.83      29.35      -0.55         0.85            -2.03
   0 H Florida Southe  (17- 2, 99.3)    10-18       -0.62      30.56      -0.55         0.85            -1.00
   0 H Tampa           (17- 1, 99.9)     9-10       -0.00      31.18      -0.55         0.85            -0.47
   0 A Palm Beach Atl  ( 6-10, 91.0)    22- 9       -8.94      22.24       0.55         0.85            19.39
   0 H Rollins         ( 8- 8, 94.7)    21-11       -5.19      25.99      -0.55         0.85            21.64
   0 A Lynn            (13- 4, 97.3)    11-10       -2.63      28.56       0.55         0.85            24.76
   0 A Tampa           (17- 1, 99.9)    11-14       -0.00      31.18       0.55         0.85            -0.47
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       262.78

winning pts = 268.5710 losing points = -5.7866

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------